IMPROVEMENTS IN PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES AMONG PATIENTS WITH RESOLUTION OF ENTHESITIS AND/OR DACTYLITIS: POST HOC ANALYSES FROM THE KEEPSAKE 1 AND 2 TRIALS OF RISANKIZUMAB IN PATIENTS WITH ACTIVE PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS

BackgroundEnthesitis and dactylitis are associated with greater disease activity and reduced quality of life. Results from the phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled KEEPsAKE 1 and 2 studies (NCT03675308;NCT03671148) of risankizumab in active PsA showed greater resolution of enthesitis and dactylitis with risankizumab 150 mg vs placebo at week 24.ObjectivesThis post hoc analysis evaluated improvements in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) among patients who had enthesitis (n=444), dactylitis (n=188), or both (n=128) at baseline and achieved resolution of enthesitis, dactylitis, or both with blinded risankizumab at weeks 0, 4, 16, and open-label risankizumab every 12 weeks thereafter.MethodsAssessments included achievement of minimal clinically important differences (MCID) in pain (≥10-mm decrease on visual analog scale), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI;≥0.35-unit decrease), and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT-Fatigue;≥4-point increase). Nonresponder imputation (with multiple imputation for COVID-19–related missing data at week 24) was used.ResultsMany patients who achieved resolution of enthesitis at week 24;week 52 also achieved MCID in pain (66.4%;71.4%), HAQ-DI (58.2%;63.4%), and FACIT-Fatigue (59.0%;72.1%). Many patients who achieved resolution of dactylitis at week 24;week 52 also achieved MCID in pain, (72.2%;81.7%), HAQ-DI (56.3%;66.2%), and FACIT-Fatigue (67.7%;69.9%). Many patients who achieved resolution of both enthesitis and dactylitis at week 24;week 52 also achieved MCID in pain (82.1%;86.4%) HAQ-DI (66.7%;69.2%), and FACIT-Fatigue (71.4%;74.6%). PRO results for patients for who did not achieve resolution of enthesitis and/or dactylitis will be presented.ConclusionMajority of patients who achieved resolution of enthesitis and/or dactylitis with risankizumab also reported improvements in pain, disability, and fatigue.AcknowledgementsAbbVie and the authors thank the patients who participated in the study and all study investigators for their contributions. Medical writing assistance, funded by AbbVie, was provided by Lisa M Pitchford, PhD, of JB Ashtin.Disclosure of InterestsShawn Kwatra Consultant of: AbbVie, Aslan Pharmaceuticals, Arcutis, Celldex, Galderma, Genzada Pharmaceuticals, Incyte, Johnson & Johnson, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, and Sanofi., Grant/research support from: Galderma, Incyte, Pfizer, and Sanofi., Saakshi Khattri Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, and UCB, Grant/research support from: Bristol Myers Squibb, LEO Pharma, Novartis, and Pfizer, Ahmad Amin Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Dermavant, Eli Lilly, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Regeneron, Sanofi/Genzyme, Pfizer, and UCB, Ran Liu Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, Byron Padilla Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, Ahmed M. Soliman Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, Blair Kaplan Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, Dennis McGonagle Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Janssen, Novartis, and Pfizer., Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Janssen, Novartis, and Pfizer, UCB, BMS, Celgene.

Effect of 2 Different High-Dose Methylprednisolone Treatments on Clinical Outcomes in Severe COVID-19 Patients

OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to evaluate and compare the use of 2 different high-dose methylprednisolone posology in treat-ing severe coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia regarding mortality and recovery time between themselves and against steroidal/ non-steroidal treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Severe coronavirus disease 2019 patients followed up between March 2020 and January 2021 were included. The steroid-free treatment protocol was applied before August 2020 (non-pulse group) and a treatment algorithm containing normal and high doses of methylprednisolone was applied after August 2020 (pulse group). Patients with clinical deterioration under the normal dose of methylprednisolone were administered 250 mg or 1000 mg of methylprednisolone for 3 days. We compared the pulse and non-pulse groups, in addition to pulse subgroups with each other, for clinical outcomes. RESULT(S): A total of 138 patients were included, including 36 patients in the non-pulse group and 102 in the pulse group. In the pulse group, 70 patients received 1000 mg/day and 32 received 250 mg/day of high-dose methylprednisolone therapy. In the comparison of pulse and non-pulse patient groups, mortality rate was lower in the pulse group (P <.001), and the time to discharge without oxygen support was shorter. Although the patients in the 250 mg subgroup were older, there was no difference between the 250 mg and 1000 mg subgroups in terms of end of oxygen requirement, discharge with oxygen support, and mortality. In addition, the required time to reach the oxygen-free period in patients discharged without oxygen support was similar in the 2 subgroups, and the majority of patients in both subgroups reached the oxygen-free period on the 20th day after initiating methylprednisolone. CONCLUSION(S): Since there was no difference in clinical improvement between the use of 250 mg or 1000 mg methylprednisolone in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 infection, 1000 mg methylprednisolone was not required.Copyright © 2023, AVES. All rights reserved.

Implementation of a Dedicated Social Worker/Coach for Emergency Medicine (EM) Residents

Learning Objectives: The pandemic exposed the mismatch between trainee mental health needs and their access to support services;therefore, the objective of our innovation was to support an opportunity for residents to work with a social worker/coach who could provide coaching on an emergent, urgent, or regular basis. Introduction/Background: EM training requires sleep-wake disruptions, includes potentially traumatizing encounters, all during the COVID-19 pandemic while many residents relocate away from their customary psychosocial supports for training. The shift-based training model limits access to psychosocial care and services, so trainees need just-in-time resources which can support them before mental health concerns develop. Educational Objectives: The objective of our innovation was to support an opportunity for our residents to work with a professional social worker who could provide coaching on an emergent, urgent, or regular basis. Curricular Design: The leadership team identified a clinical social worker and trained coach to provide small group and individual coaching sessions to residents (4-year urban safety-net program with 68 residents) budgeted at an initial cost of $15,000. It was agreed that what was shared in the discussion would not be shared without consent and legal limits to confidentiality were followed. Impact: From October 1, 2020 when implemented to October 1, 2021 there were 49 group and 73 individual sessions. After implementation in 2021, we compared this rotational mean score as ranked by all residents to all other wellness initiatives. Overall response rate was 80.88%. The overall mean score of the initiative was 2.25 (1-lowest and 4-highest) versus 3.73, the mean of all other wellness initiatives. Summary comments from the residents revealed the innovation was useful but shared concern regarding ability to attend sessions and capacity of social worker to relate with them. If other programs are considering implementation of a similar program recruiting someone with ED/graduate medical education experience or making sure they are oriented is key. Application of a social worker coaching program in an EM residency appears to be a feasible novel wellness intervention with potential to improve well-being, but needs framing to benefit trainees.

LONG-TERM SAFETY of RISANKIZUMAB in PATIENTS with PSORIATIC DISEASE: FINDINGS from INTEGRATED ANALYSES of 17 CLINICAL TRIALS in PSORIASIS and 4 in PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS

Background: Risankizumab, an interleukin-23 inhibitor, was efficacious and well tolerated in phase 2 and 3 clinical studies in patients with psoriatic disease. Objectives: To report long-term risankizumab safety in patients with psoriatic disease. Methods: Risankizumab safety data to March 25, 2021 were pooled from 17 phase 1-3 clinical trials in plaque psoriasis (PsO) and 4 phase 2/3 trials in pso-riatic arthritis (PsA). Adverse events (AEs) of safety interest were reported for patients receiving ≥1 dose risankizumab. Results: Among 3197 patients with PsO (9982.6 patient years' [PY] exposure;median (range) treatment duration, 3.7 years [1 day-6.9 years]) and 1542 patients with PsA (1594.9 PY;1. 0 year [84 days-2.0 years]), rates of treatment-emergent AEs (158.3 and 160.8 events (E)/100PY), serious AEs (7.6 and 8.4 E/100PY) and AEs leading to discontinuation (1.9 and 2.3 E/100PY) were similar. Nasopharyn-gitis (PsO 14.5 E/100PY, PsA 7. 9 E/100PY) and upper respiratory infection (PsO 7. 8 E/100PY, PsA 5.6 E/100PY) were the most common infections;sepsis and pneumonia for PsO (0.1 E/100PY each) and COVID-19 for PsA (0.4 E/100PY) were the most common serious infections. Rates of opportunistic fungal infections were <0.1 and 0.1 E/100PY in PsO/PsA patients. Rates of non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) were 0.7 and 0.4 E/100PY, and malignant tumors excluding NMSC were 0.6 and 0.3 E/100PY in PsO/PsA patients. Rates of major adverse cardiovascular events were 0.5 and 0.4 E/100PY in PsO/PsA patients. Conclusion: Rates of AEs of safety interest remained low in this largest and longest safety reporting for risankizumab to date, supporting the safety of risankizumab for the long-term treatment of patients with psoriatic disease.

FINANCING VACCINES FOR GLOBAL HEALTH SECURITY

Recent outbreaks of infectious pathogens such as Zika, Ebola, and COVID-19 have underscored the need for the dependable availability of vaccines against emerging infectious diseases (EIDs). Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, the cost and risk of R&D programs and uniquely unpredictable demand for EID vaccines discouraged many potential vaccine developers, and government and nonprofit agencies have struggled to provide timely or sufficient incentives for their development and sustained supply. However, the economic climate has changed significantly post-pandemic. To explore this contrast, we analyze the pre pandemic economic returns of a portfolio of EID vaccine assets, and find that, under realistic financing assumptions, the expected returns are significantly negative, implying that the private sector is unlikely to address this need without public-sector intervention. However, in a post-pandemic policy landscape, the financing deficit for this portfolio can be closed, and we analyze several potential solutions, including enhanced public-private partnerships and subscription models in which governments would pay annual fees to obtain access to a portfolio of stockpiled vaccines in the event of an outbreak.